TY - JOUR
T1 - Significance of Targeted Antimicrobial Prophylaxis Using Rectal-culture Selective Screening Media Prior to Transrectal Prostate Biopsy
T2 - A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial
AU - Sadahira, Takuya
AU - Sekito, Takanori
AU - Maruyama, Yuki
AU - Ichikawa, Takaharu
AU - Kurihara, Yuki
AU - Shiraishi, Hiromasa
AU - Sakuma, Takafumi
AU - Tokunaga, Moto
AU - Mitsui, Yosuke
AU - Kusumi, Norihiro
AU - Tominaga, Yusuke
AU - Katayama, Satoshi
AU - Iwata, Takehiro
AU - Nishimura, Shingo
AU - Edamura, Kohei
AU - Kobayashi, Tomoko
AU - Watanabe, Masami
AU - Hiyama, Yoshiki
AU - Yamada, Hiroki
AU - Kurata, Hiroki
AU - Kondo, Tsubasa
AU - Mitsui, Masao
AU - Takenaka, Tadasu
AU - Kiyota, Hiroshi
AU - Araki, Motoo
AU - Miyazaki, Jun
AU - Takahashi, Satoshi
AU - Yamamoto, Shingo
AU - Wada, Koichiro
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2025/2
Y1 - 2025/2
N2 - Objective: To examine whether antimicrobial prophylaxis based on screening rectal cultures using selective media prevented acute bacterial prostatitis following transrectal prostate biopsy (TRPB). Methods: In this multicenter, randomized controlled trial, we enrolled 403 patients undergoing TRPB with low risks of infectious complications. Patients were randomized into a cultured group (CG) or no cultured group (NCG). In the CG, patients with positive-culture results for fluoroquinolone (FQ)-resistant or extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli (E. coli) used piperacillin/tazobactam as prophylaxis, and those with negative-culture results and in the NCG used levofloxacin. The primary endpoint was the incidence of acute prostatitis after TRPB. The secondary endpoint was the accuracy of the selective media. Results: Of 373 patients (CG, 187; NCG, 186), 67 were positive, and 120 were negative for rectal culture in the CG. The overall incidence of prostatitis after TRPB was 1.1% (n = 4). The incidences in the CG and the NCG were 1.6% (n = 3, all negative-culture cases) and 0.5% (n = 1), respectively, without significant difference (P = .3). No prostatitis occurred in the positive-culture group. The sensitivity and specificity of the levofloxacin-insusceptible selective media were 98.1% and 94.7%, respectively. Conclusion: Screening with selective media before TRPB in patients with low infectious risks may provide additive value to preventing post-biopsy prostatitis. Piperacillin/tazobactam can be considered when FQ-resistant or ESBL-producing E. coli is detected.
AB - Objective: To examine whether antimicrobial prophylaxis based on screening rectal cultures using selective media prevented acute bacterial prostatitis following transrectal prostate biopsy (TRPB). Methods: In this multicenter, randomized controlled trial, we enrolled 403 patients undergoing TRPB with low risks of infectious complications. Patients were randomized into a cultured group (CG) or no cultured group (NCG). In the CG, patients with positive-culture results for fluoroquinolone (FQ)-resistant or extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli (E. coli) used piperacillin/tazobactam as prophylaxis, and those with negative-culture results and in the NCG used levofloxacin. The primary endpoint was the incidence of acute prostatitis after TRPB. The secondary endpoint was the accuracy of the selective media. Results: Of 373 patients (CG, 187; NCG, 186), 67 were positive, and 120 were negative for rectal culture in the CG. The overall incidence of prostatitis after TRPB was 1.1% (n = 4). The incidences in the CG and the NCG were 1.6% (n = 3, all negative-culture cases) and 0.5% (n = 1), respectively, without significant difference (P = .3). No prostatitis occurred in the positive-culture group. The sensitivity and specificity of the levofloxacin-insusceptible selective media were 98.1% and 94.7%, respectively. Conclusion: Screening with selective media before TRPB in patients with low infectious risks may provide additive value to preventing post-biopsy prostatitis. Piperacillin/tazobactam can be considered when FQ-resistant or ESBL-producing E. coli is detected.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85213952096&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.urology.2024.12.018
DO - 10.1016/j.urology.2024.12.018
M3 - 学術論文
C2 - 39694101
AN - SCOPUS:85213952096
SN - 0090-4295
VL - 196
SP - 32
EP - 39
JO - Urology
JF - Urology
ER -